lol at the plebs below

Even for top players, there's always someone who has the potential to be better. Think about it this way. I'd bet that most of the top 10 right now would beat 2010 mango/armada. If they didn't stay on top of their game, theres always someone that *can* supersede them.

remember even mango is a buster 40 percent of the time

I think the first statement statement is flawed. Theoretically, there's always someone who's the "best" at any given point. If there was always someone better, that would mean there is an infinite number of players, that the actual best hasn't had a chance to beat the best (because that's how we determine who's "best") or just that the one who was the best has been beaten. That said, it would make more sense saying "Chances are there will* be someone better" *rolls away*